[ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-420?page=history ]
     
Aaron Mulder closed GERONIMO-420:
---------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

It turns out it's useful to be able to distinguish.  Might want to move common 
code into a superclass, but don't want to replace subclasses.

> Refactor *UserPrincipal and *GroupPrincipal
> -------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-420
>          URL: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-420
>      Project: Apache Geronimo
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: security
>     Versions: 1.0-M2
>     Reporter: Aaron Mulder

>
> It would be nice if the default security realms all used the same user and 
> group principal implementation classes.  For one thing, the code is 99% 
> identical across all 4 existing implementation classes.  But also, these are 
> essentially generic, and it would be nice to provide generic implementations 
> of users and groups that custom login modules could take advantage of, 
> instead of setting the precedent that every module must have a new and 
> different set of principal classes.
> If we truly make the user and group principals generic, we would lose the 
> current behavior that equals() can distinguish between a SQLUserPrincipal 
> "foo" and a PropertiesFileUserPrincipal "foo", but I'm not sure that's all 
> that important anyway -- the required class name goes into the configuration 
> files, so if the class name isn't correct then the principal needs to be 
> discarded regardless of what equals() reports.  Plus, a principal "foo" from 
> FileRealm "bar" is not actually the same as a principal "foo" from FileRealm 
> "baz" even though the user principal implementation classes and user 
> principal names are both the same -- so the current equals implementation 
> isn't fully correct anyway.
> However, if we still want different classes for different realm types for any 
> reason, we could at least put all the code in a base class and then have 
> empty subclasses.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to