Aaron, Was anything decided on this topic? I didn't see a JIRA issue raised.
Thanks, John Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/10/2004 07:31:09 AM: > All, > I suggest we add the "Geronimo version number" to our schema file > names and namespaces. For example, a Geronimo Jetty header currently > looks like this: > > <web-app > xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/web/jetty"; > xmlns:naming="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming"; > configId="..." parentId="..."> > > And I'm thinking it ought to be more like this: > > <web-app > xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/web/jetty_1_0"; > xmlns:naming="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/naming_1_0"; > configId="..." parentId="..." > > > Or else like this: > > <web-app > xmlns="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/1.0/web/jetty"; > xmlns:naming="http://geronimo.apache.org/xml/ns/1.0/naming"; > configId="..." parentId="..." > > > I'm thinking 2 or 3 release down the road, when we'll want to be > able to look at a deployment plan and identify which release it was > developed against, since the deployment plan format will surely change as > we go. It will also let us put the Schemas on our web site and there > would be a more obvious correspondance between the namespace and the > schema location. > > Aaron
