--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm not suggesting XDoclet2 is not the way forward
> and my decision was
> based upon nontechnical observations. It would be
> nice if we could
> provide both XDoclet 1.2.2 and XDoclet2 support, so
> the user has the
> choice of what they want to use. If we are going to
> do that, we would
> want to ensure that the @Geronimo tags are
> consistent between the two, so
> people can move from one to the other as easily as
> possible.
I think this is the right path to choose. We could
implement XDoclet 1.x and XDoclet2 having same tag
specifications while developing, possibly, in
parallel.
This could even speed up things for geronimo users.
- len
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com
