Hi David,
Yep. server side threads were not being clean up. It should be now fixed. Please dl a new copy of activeio and build security to see if it fixes that thread problem for you too.
Thanks, Hiram
David Jencks wrote:
Many thanks, the new version of activeio seems to make the tests all pass. However, I wonder if there is still a problem somewhere. I'm seeing the itests go very very slowly and the thread count is now at 288.
david jencks
On Dec 26, 2004, at 6:59 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi David,
I just pushed up a new copy of activeio that should fix the problem. Could you pull it down and try again.
David Jencks wrote:
I'm getting test failures on the following on both linux and osX:
org.apache.geronimo.security.jaas.LoginPropertiesFileTest
org.apache.geronimo.security.jaas.LoginSQLTest
org.apache.geronimo.security.jaas.TimeoutTest
org.apache.geronimo.security.network.protocol.SubjectCarryingProtocolT es t
At least two of the problems appear to be related as the report's stack trace starts with:
Testcase: testLogin(org.apache.geronimo.security.jaas.LoginPropertiesFileTest): Caused an ERROR
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.activeio.adapter.PacketInputStream.read(PacketInputStream.java: 51)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.read(ObjectInputStream.java: 2150)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$PeekInputStream.readFully(ObjectInputStream. ja va:2163)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream$BlockDataInputStream.readShort(ObjectInputSt re am.java:2631)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.readStreamHeader(ObjectInputStream.java: 734)
at java.io.ObjectInputStream.<init>(ObjectInputStream.java:253)
at org.apache.geronimo.security.remoting.jmx.ObjectInputStreamExt.<init>( Ob jectInputStreamExt.java:35)
at org.apache.geronimo.security.remoting.jmx.RequestChannelInterceptor.de se rialize(RequestChannelInterceptor.java:104)
at org.apache.geronimo.security.remoting.jmx.RequestChannelInterceptor.in vo ke(RequestChannelInterceptor.java:69)
at org.apache.geronimo.proxy.SimpleRPCContainer.invoke(SimpleRPCContainer .j ava:48)
Any ideas?
thanks david jencks
