What if those classes are only availble in the target server?

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Sent: Tue 1/25/2005 5:21 PM 
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: svn commit: r126427 - 
/geronimo/trunk/modules/service-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service/ServiceConfigBuilder.java
        
        

        Why?  I seems to me that if you say you have a dependency we should 
        verify that we can satisfy that dependency before deploying.
        
        -dain
        
        On Jan 25, 2005, at 2:00 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
        
        > I am of the opinion that this feature should be optional.
        >
        >
        > Regards,
        > Alan
        >
        >       -----Original Message-----
        >       From: Gianny Damour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >       Sent: Tue 1/25/2005 5:01 PM
        >       To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >       Cc:
        >       Subject: Re: svn commit: r126427 - 
        > /geronimo/trunk/modules/service-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/
        > deployment/service/ServiceConfigBuilder.java
        >      
        >      
        >
        >       Hi David,
        >      
        >       It seems that this is related to this JIRA issue:
        >      
        >         [ 
        > http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-504?
        > page=comments#action_55900 ]
        >      
        >       that Jeremy has commented.
        >      
        >       Thanks,
        >       Gianny
        >      
        >       On 26/01/2005 8:33 AM, David Jencks wrote:
        >      
        >       > I'd like to check that this doesn't violate any philosophical
        >       > principles behind deployment.  I think that all classes used 
at
        >       > runtime  should be available at deployment time: this patch 
checks
        >       > that all  dependencies are in fact present at deployment 
time.  Any
        >       > arguments?
        >       >
        >       > thanks
        >       > david jencks
        >       >
        >       > On Jan 25, 2005, at 1:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
        >       >
        >       >> Author: djencks
        >       >> Date: Tue Jan 25 13:30:16 2005
        >       >> New Revision: 126427
        >       >>
        >       >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=126427
        >       >> Log:
        >       >> If a dependency is missing, let us know immediately, not 
when a
        >       >> class  can't be loaded
        >       >> Modified:
        >       >>
        >       >> 
        > geronimo/trunk/modules/service-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/
        >       >> deployment/service/ServiceConfigBuilder.java
        >       >>
        >       >> Modified:
        >       >> 
        > geronimo/trunk/modules/service-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/
        >       >> deployment/service/ServiceConfigBuilder.java
        >       >> Url:
        >       >> 
        > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/geronimo/trunk/modules/service-builder/
        >       >> src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service/
        >       >> 
ServiceConfigBuilder.java?view=diff&rev=126427&p1=geronimo/trunk/
        >       >> 
modules/service-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/
        >       >> 
        > service/ServiceConfigBuilder.java&r1=126426&p2=geronimo/trunk/modules/
        >       >> 
service-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/deployment/service/
        >       >> ServiceConfigBuilder.java&r2=126427
        >       >> 
        > 
=======================================================================
        >       >> =======
        >       >> ---
        >       >> 
        > geronimo/trunk/modules/service-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/
        >       >> deployment/service/ServiceConfigBuilder.java    (original)
        >       >> +++
        >       >> 
        > geronimo/trunk/modules/service-builder/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/
        >       >> deployment/service/ServiceConfigBuilder.java    Tue Jan 25 
        > 13:30:16 2005
        >       >> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
        >       >>  import org.apache.geronimo.kernel.Kernel;
        >       >>  import 
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.ConfigurationModuleType;
        >       >>  import org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.Repository;
        >       >> +import
        >       >> 
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.repository.MissingDependencyException;
        >       >>  import org.apache.xmlbeans.XmlException;
        >       >>
        >       >>  /**
        >       >> @@ -153,7 +154,7 @@
        >       >>      public static void addIncludes(DeploymentContext 
context,
        >       >> DependencyType[] includes, Repository repository) throws
        >       >> DeploymentException {
        >       >>          for (int i = 0; i < includes.length; i++) {
        >       >>              DependencyType include = includes[i];
        >       >> -            URI uri = getDependencyURI(include);
        >       >> +            URI uri = getDependencyURI(include, repository);
        >       >>              String name = uri.toString();
        >       >>              int idx = name.lastIndexOf('/');
        >       >>              if (idx != -1) {
        >       >> @@ -176,7 +177,7 @@
        >       >>
        >       >>      public static void addDependencies(DeploymentContext 
context,
        >       >> DependencyType[] deps, Repository repository) throws
        >       >> DeploymentException {
        >       >>          for (int i = 0; i < deps.length; i++) {
        >       >> -            URI dependencyURI = getDependencyURI(deps[i]);
        >       >> +            URI dependencyURI = getDependencyURI(deps[i], 
        > repository);
        >       >>              context.addDependency(dependencyURI);
        >       >>
        >       >>              URL url;
        >       >> @@ -264,7 +265,7 @@
        >       >>          return gBeanData;
        >       >>      }
        >       >>
        >       >> -    private static URI getDependencyURI(DependencyType dep) 
throws
        >       >> DeploymentException {
        >       >> +    private static URI getDependencyURI(DependencyType dep,
        >       >> Repository repository) throws DeploymentException {
        >       >>          URI uri;
        >       >>          if (dep.isSetUri()) {
        >       >>              try {
        >       >> @@ -280,6 +281,9 @@
        >       >>              } catch (URISyntaxException e) {
        >       >>                  throw new DeploymentException("Unable to 
construct
        >       >> URI for groupId=" + dep.getGroupId() + ", artifactId=" +
        >       >> dep.getArtifactId() + ", version=" + dep.getVersion(), e);
        >       >>              }
        >       >> +        }
        >       >> +        if (!repository.hasURI(uri)) {
        >       >> +            throw new DeploymentException(new
        >       >> MissingDependencyException("uri " + uri + " not found in  
        > repository"));
        >       >>          }
        >       >>          return uri;
        >       >>      }
        >       >>
        >       >
        >       >
        >      
        >      
        >
        
        

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to