On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:13:50PM -0500, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > I don't parse the data at startup. The data gets parsed by a > tssConfigEditor and a cssConfigEditor at deployment time.
Cool. Is this a case where you could put the xml in another file in the archive and have the attribute be the name of the file? > You would know that if you read the code. Oh, wait... ROFL! Don't ever change, Mr. Cabrera. But if you do, please check it in right away. -David > > > Regards, > Alan > P.S. Yes, the schema and editors are on openejb-builder, Mr. Jenks! P.P.S You forgot the "c" > > David Blevins wrote: > > >Just wondering if we aren't side-stepping the deployment system rather > >than expanding it to meet our needs. The idea of gbeans parsing xml > >at startup and configuring themselves creeps me out. The config data > >in the xml won't always be valid and the xml won't always be well formed. > > > >I've often thought that a component should be able to have it's own > >chunk of xml and it's own logic for configuring the component using > >that xml. > > > >-David > > > >On Feb 22, 2005, at 7:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > > >>Something we control. The CSIv2 configuration that I am using is > >>very hierarchical. Everything works w/ the CDATA. > >> > >>Regards, > >>Alan > >> > >> > >>David Blevins wrote: > >> > >>>Is this xml for a third party piece of software or something that we > >>>control? > >>> > >>>-David > >>> > >>>On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:59 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >>> > >>>>I have no problem reading in the string into XML. It just looks > >>>>ugly in the plan file. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>Regards, > >>>>Alan > >>>> > >>>>David Jencks wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>I'm not sure this is such a good idea. > >>>>> > >>>>>It's going to require changing the gbean schema to allow an any > >>>>>element and mixed content in a gbean attribute element. In > >>>>>principle I object strongly to mixed content. I think the extra > >>>>>complications indicate that the CDATA solution is much much > >>>>>simpler. Is there a problem with it? What are you trying to pass > >>>>>in? What are you doing with the results? Do you want an > >>>>>XmlObject, a string, a DOM element, a STAX stream...? > >>>>> > >>>>>thanks > >>>>>david jencks > >>>>> > >>>>>On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>No reason other then no one ever tried it. If you want to change > >>>>>>the builder code, go for it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>-dain > >>>>>> > >>>>>>-- > >>>>>>Dain Sundstrom > >>>>>>Chief Architect > >>>>>>Gluecode Software > >>>>>>310.536.8355, ext. 26 > >>>>>> > >>>>>>On Feb 22, 2005, at 5:31 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Why do I have to wrap XML in CDATA when I want to pass XML to > >>>>>>>GBean attributes? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Regards, > >>>>>>>Alan > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>
