Um, Srinath wrong list? ;-) Sanjiva.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Srinath Perera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:49 PM Subject: [Axis2][Revisit]How about making Message context executable? > Hi All; > > I put this Q about making the MessageContext executable? I do not get > a clear response .. > May be it does not call for enough attention? > > But I feel this is bit too bigger change to do without enough > community input .. So I feel we should hold it back for the F2F. But > then "pause the engine execution at some state" should wait too > thoughts? > Srinath > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:49:43 +0600 > Subject: Re: [Axis2]How about making Message context executable? > To: [email protected], Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Hi there Srinath and all, > This is probably a complete 180 degree turn from where we were heading > (well not exactly a backward leap, but a drastic change in direction). > The Message Context (MC) was pursued only as a property bag. Now we > are trying to put executable actions there! So the role of the MC is > changed now. I am not sure what this means to the structure of axis. > I guess this needs to be thought out carefully. > BTW if we are to do such a change this is the best time to tackle such > a change. It will be impossible on later stage. > > > On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:54:59 +0600, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi All; > > > > This is regarding the invoke, pausing and resuming the the invocation! > > > > To this point this is implemented with an ExecutionChain kept in the > > MessageContext ..calling the invoke on the MessageContext. > > > > But more I look at the code more I convinced the way the Glen has done > > it in EngineToy by putting the invoke(), resume() and pause() in the > > MessageContext would yield simpler and better code. Only catch is that > > it will make the MessageContext executable .. making it bit away from > > what we percive about it! > > > > thoughts? > > > > I have a bit more revolutionary proposal to add (hope I will not > > killed for saying this :D ) that is to get rid of the AxisEngine and > > put the send and receive in to the MessageContext. Making it our > > approach is to create the information bag, messageContext and ask it > > to send(), recive(), pause() .. I just want to know what people think > > about this? > > > > Thanks > > Srinath > > > > -- > Ajith Ranabahu >
