[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-620?page=history ] Gianny DAMOUR closed GERONIMO-620: ----------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed Fix Version: 1.0-M4 IPv6 is now supported. Also the syntax to specify IP address restrictions is now compliant with some of the xinetd syntax. Note, compressed IPv6 notations are not supported. > ServiceAccessController does not support ip6address > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-620 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-620 > Project: Geronimo > Type: Bug > Components: OpenEJB > Reporter: Dain Sundstrom > Assignee: Gianny DAMOUR > Fix For: 1.0-M4 > > The ServiceAccessController class does not work with ip6 addresses. I have > added an if statement that skips ip6 addresses. > Also I think we should use the standard ip bit mask filtering rule style for > the masks that xinetd uses. I found a ok description of the style here > http://www.hn.edu.cn/book/NetWork/NetworkingBookshelf_2ndEd/tcp/ch12_05.htm > (look near the bottom of this page) but I bet there are better ones out there. > 172.16.12.5 defines a specific host > 129.6.0.0 defines all hosts with an address that begins with 129.6 > 0.0.0.0 matches all addresses > 172.16.12.{3,6,8,23} defines four different hosts: 172.16.12.3, 172.16.12.6, > 172.16.12.8, and 172.16.12.23 > 172.16.12.128/25 match every address from 172.16.12.128 to 172.16.12.255 > I also think you can do the following which is an address and a mask: > 172.16.12.0/255.255.224.0 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira