On 5/27/05, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Security-wise it is also a nightmare. There is so much stuff running in
> | the container that I have no idea of. I usually bind the instance to
> | localhost and do port translation for those TCP/IP services that need
> | to be exposed, but even then there are still many ways to connect to it
> | from localhost that could potentially expose information or give
> | control to unauthorized people.
> |
> | S.
> |
> Exactly. And seeing another huge "everything to everyone" server is why
> I never got motivated to do more than observe Geronimo. I'd be better
> served keeping up on what I have to do to keep my existing 'monolith' as
> secure as possible. If it can be broken down, re-arranged, reassembled -
> and still "just work", it would be THE server to use - not just
> "another" server.
I think that this discussion thread now has two distinctly different topics:
a) Geronimo SVN repo restructuring
b) Geronimo modules packaging for user consumption
Can we please split this discussion and keep each one on topic?
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
