On May 28, 2005, at 1:41 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I think I wrote something a little confusing...let me clarify...
What we do to a subset of Geronimo has impact on the whether it
passes. However if Geronimo passes the TCK, then a subset would
include the features that passed.
Technically speaking, you couldn't make that claim.
However, as it stands, passing is an all-or-nothing propsition.
Yes.
We do have licenses for stand-alone TCKs for projects that we have.
I'd be hard-pressed to argue that we should be able to get TCks for
things we don't have, like JMS.
geir
I hope that was less confuusing.
Jeff Genender wrote:
Brian K. Wallace wrote:
~ 1. Assuming the whole of Geronimo passes the TCK, what can be
said of
a 'minimal' Geronimo? Is it able to claim anything with regard to
the TCK?
TCK is all or nothing. You pass all tests or you don't pass
certification. A minimal Geronimo would clearly be a subset of
the "whole tomato", so TCK has no bearing on this, nor should
there be concern. A minimal Geronimo is just disconnecting the
features you don't want from the configuration. TCK and minimal
Geronimo are mutually exclusive and do not impact each other in
any way.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
