Someone correct me if I'm wrong -- Michael,
Geronimo has a microkernel style architecture and Spring is being used to wire together the core services. Thomas --- Michael McGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My understanding is that Geronimo is a > state-of-the-art somewhat > classic J2EE framework. My understanding also is > that Spring is a > somewhat different approach, moving away from > Enterprise Java Beans. > If one is merely interested in JMS, is there any > reason to prefer a > framework like Geronimo to Spring, given that my > understanding is > correct? If my understanding is not correct, would > you please > straighten me out? Thanks. > > Michael McGrady >
