On 7/11/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> Fine : I'm going to suggest
>
> /geronimo/sandbox/misc/SoC
> /geronimo/sandbox/donations/trifork
> /geronimo/sandbox/donations/ibm
Location within the Geronimo SVN repo is not a big concern to me. What
is a big concern is how we decide to accept it.
> as our pattern
>
> > - pick one of:
> > - add separate ACL for each donation in there
> > - have people from contributing company operate via patches
> >
> > I would personally lean slightly toward patches, though I
> > anticipate the donators may prefer ACLs. In any case, if and when the
> > code becomes part of Geronimo proper, I think the donators will
> > need to
> > qualify for Geronimo commit status as normal.
>
> Right, and that's up to us. "Qualify" is currently subjective.
>
> I'd be happy w/ separate ACLs to let people work as fast and
> "normally" as possible, w/o having to wait for patches to be
> accepted. There's no danger with SVN. That said, I'd go w/ patches
> if that was the consensus.
I lean toward the idea of patches as well. This is the console that
was created by Gluecode so I believe the creators are already
committers. If this assumption is incorrect, can someone please
elaborate further on the state of the code since Gluecode was
swallowed by IBM.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
