On Jul 11, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Note I wrote "I believe". Based on conversations I've had and from
what I have seen on this list, *I believe* that this code will
ultimately end up in a subproject.
I guess I'm still not clear on "subproject". You mean like with
its own home page at "http://corba.geronimo.apache.org/"; and
separate JIRA
and all? Or it uses all the same infrastructure as Geronimo but has a
separate /trunk somewhere in SVN?
No - at best it would be
http://geronimo.apache.org/corba
(or whatever)
IMO, it would be the same infra as geronimo, with the same set of
committers [eventually], sharing the same dev list (until volume
dictates otherwise), with an independent release cycle, that is a
responsibility of the Geronimo PMC.
What are you talking about? We are in a thread to discuss the
specific donation of the IBM console, not a thread to decide a policy
on general code donation and committers. If you would like to
discuss those, please start a new thread and address it directly.
For my part, I'm just as happy to try to set a precendent and
handle the TriFork and IBM donations the same way to start with --
in a
separate SVN area in within the Geronimo SVN repo, either each with
own
ACL or sharing the Geronimo ACL and contributor employees
contribute via
patches. Whether they go on to become "subprojects" or "modules" or
whatever can be decided later, right?
I believe so.
geir
Aaron
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
