Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Jul 11, 2005, at 10:56 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
[SNIP]
After giving the whole issue some more thought, I think I would
prefer the TriFork code go to the incubator. I'm fine going
either way
with the web console (incubator or "sandbox area" with own ACL).
I guess
that means that if we need a single policy/guideline, I'd lean
toward the
incubator.
I don't see the value add in going directly to the incubator unless
they wanted to graduate as a TLP out of the gate. If this is the
case, then they wouldn't have bothered us to begin w/.
Just a comment -
yes - that's something we need to get a handle on - what's the value
to send off to Incubator unless it will be some kind of TLP or a
distinct, standalone community of some sort.
Has the Harmony project addressed the ORB issue yet? That's certainly a
project that will need to come to grips with this issue at some point.
If they have a common interest, that's would certainly be a point in
favor of the incubator. Otherwise, it might make more sense for it to
be part of Geronimo so it can be the "best Geronimo ORB" possible.
I don't wish to see our subprojects, if we add them, be formally
distinct sub-communities of Geronimo.
geir
