+1 for moving to xmlbeans v2 in HEAD and M4 John
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or non-public information. This information is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author personally. David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 13/07/2005 06:45:26 AM: > After struggling with various attempts to use several incompatible > versions at once, I have geronimo + openejb working with xmlbeans v2. > > I've modified the plugin to install the schemas that are compiled into > the artifact jar file under typically META-INF/schema, and these > schemas can be extracted by the xmlbeans plugin entity resolver to > resolve schema imports. This dramatically reduces the use of a catalog > and makes it possible to remove the difficult-to-keep-synchronized > copies of geronimo schemas that are in openejb-builder/src/schema. > > I've run a lot of the tck and get the same results with v2 as v1. > > I'd like to commit this, well, now to at least the HEAD of geronimo and > openejb. Any objections? I would like to do this very soon, such as > this evening. > > As part of the snapshot cleanup for m4 we should stop using the 1.0-DEV > version and upgrade to something that's been released. Choices are > 1.0.4 and 2.0.0. I'd prefer 2, and would be more enthusiastic about > looking for problems with that upgrade, but don't insist. > > I will note that having different version of xmlbeans on two versions > of geronimo is incredibly inconvenient, since a complete rebuild is > needed when switching from one to the other. It may be that having > different versions (M4 vs SNAPSHOT) will make this problem go away, but > I haven't tested this theory. > > Opinions on moving M4 to xmlbeans2? > > I've opened GERONIMO-738 to track this and to let people look at the > patches to evaluate especially applying to M4. > > thanks > david jencks >
