Well, I was going to start a new thread, but it seems Alan doesn't
like that, so...
Would it be accurate to say that the options on the table for
donated code are:
1) Bring (project X) to geronimo, grant full commit status to (some number
of people) who have worked with the code before
2) Bring project X to geronimo, put in a clearly separate SVN area,
grant restricted commit status (via ACL or explicit direction) to some
number of people who have worked with the code before
3) Bring project X to the incubator, mix outside people and potentially
Geronimo people to form a new project team
It's clear that there's a variety of opinions as to which of these
is preferable, and potentially which is most preferable for the web
console vs the ORB.
Aaron
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, David Blevins wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:17:44PM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > It's a judgement call i guess. i have not been on the calls. If you
> > guys feel that it can support its own eco-system. then thats fine.
> >
>
> I don't know yet, myself. But certainly one cannot deny there are
> more CORBA specs than Web Services specs (for a while anyway); not
> exactly the same deal as a web console.
>
> -David
>
> > On 7/12/05, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 06:58:20PM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > > It's just that the piece of code we are talking about in both cases,
> > > > seem un-usable w/o geronimo.
> > >
> > > Is that really true? We are talking about a compliant ORB aren't we?
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
>
