On the issue of the name I vote admin-console and not include the donor's name (ala ibm-web-console). Not sure of the policy.
Matt On Sunday 17 July 2005 12:09, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > On Jul 17, 2005, at 10:49 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote: > > On Sun, 17 Jul 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > >> and we can now place into our svn repository and get to work. > >> > >> I'd be happy to take the codebase in ASAP, and Aaron can tally the > >> vote/poll for "operating mode" and we can then resolve that in > >> parallel w/ beginning work. How does that sound? > > > > Well, you've neatly dodged the question of where in SVN to place > > it. > > Not a dodge - that was the second aspect of the vote thread and I > wanted to let you complete it. > > > By my count, the poll has produced a tie (bearing in mind that a -1 > > does not appear to be a veto on this issue): > > > > Add to geronimo/incubator/ibm-web-console; restricted committers > > +1 Alan +1 Aaron +1 Dims +1 Jeff +1 John +1 Srinath +1 Geir -1 > > Dain > > Add to geronimo/sandbox/web-console; patches not committers > > +1 Aaron +1 Geir +1 Jacek +1 David B +1 Dain +1 David J > > > > The other two options totaled 1, 1, and -1. So I think it's safe > > to say that this is the decision we need to make. If we want > > something > > immediate, I recommend we put it in the sandbox with no additional > > commit > > access, and then if we ultimately decide to go the route of restricted > > committers, we can svn move it out of the main trunk. > > Yes - please do that. That is compatible with our policy of > accepting code, and no one was against accepting the code. (This is > irrespective of the committer issues under discussion) > > We can then hopefully tie up the committer issue in parallel. > > Thanks > > geir
