OK, I'll remove it. Thanks.
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or non-public information. This information is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any review, dissemination, use or reliance upon this information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the author personally. David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/07/2005 04:36:51 PM: > yes, remove it. that's very historical :-) > At one time there was a primitive soap listener in openejb. Then there > was a special port for ws on jetty. now ws runs through the normal web > port, either jetty or tomcat. > > david jencks > > On Jul 20, 2005, at 11:30 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Should the comment below be removed from the file? If not, can someone > > explain where Jetty is involved here. > > > > Should we be able to run M4 with tomcat without any jetty use at all? > > > > <!-- HTTP/SOAP Protocol is now run through jetty--> > > > > Thanks, > > > > John > > >
