We have tested the Geronimo console to work on Pluto 1.0.1 RC2. Last time we tested with RC3 we had some problems so we decided to stick with 1.0.1 RC2 for now.
--- Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this process still apply for Pluto 1.0.1-rc3? > It looks like they are now producing 3 JAR files. > > If we are spending time integrating the web console > into the sandbox, shouldn't we at least be using the > latest Pluto version and use their file names as > provided? > > > -Donald > > --- Dave Colasurdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The JIRA entry for the console (GERONIMO-762) has > > been updated with the > > instructions for creating pluto-portal.jar > (actually > > the JIRA contains > > the jar as well). > > > > Is the required fix as simple as: > > 1) Rename pluto-portal-1.0.1-rc2.jar to > > geronimo-pluto-portal.jar > > 2) Publish the new jar to the Apache maven > > repository > > 3) Change the console dependency references to use > > the new name > > > > > > Any issues with this approach? > > > > Are special privileges required to publish to the > > Apache maven > > repository (http://cvs.apache.org/repository/)? > > > > Thanks > > -Dave- > > > > > > Aaron Mulder wrote: > > > So it seems that the Pluto problem is pretty > > serious. We're > > > actually dependent on an artifact that Pluto > does > > not produce. There is > > > no "pluto-portal" output from the Pluto build. > I > > think that means we > > > shouldn't be calling it "pluto-portal", but > > instead > > > "geronimo-package-of-pluto-portal-code" or > > something along those lines > > > (but perhaps shorter). > > > > > > No wonder the Pluto fellow is not putting it in > > Maven! :) > > > > > > Aaron > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
