> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 6:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Attacking M4 > > David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 26/07/2005 > 07:59:47 AM: > > > Alright, here is the deal on M4. We have OSCON coming up > and from my > > experience, if we don't get M4 out the door this week, then > we won't > > see it till the week after OSCON. I actually tried to cut > M3 at OSCON > > last year and we all know how that went. > > > > If we don't get M4 out the door this week, our hopes of > having M5 by > > the 15th are lost. Assuming we don't want this to happen, > here is my > > attack plan: > > > > =ATTACK PLAN========== > > > > LAST ISSUES > > > > - Undeployment issue (GERONIMO-812, David Jencks) > > - Snapshots (Javamail & Axis=>Dims, jUDDI & Scout=>Geir, > > ServiceMix=>Hiram, tmpOrb=>Dain) > > - Web Services startup issue (GERONIMO-785, David Blevins) > > - Corba interop problem (GERONIMO-813, Dain Sundstrom) > > - Izpack/Tomcat issue (GERONIMO-811, Unassigned) > > See comments below. > > > - Unknown CTS issues (need to clear up GERONIMO-812 to run it > > completely) > > > > No sitting on tasks, if you are not going to do it, mark it > unassigned. > > > > Issue GERONIMO-811 is unassigned. Can someone either remove the > > Tomcat option from the IzPack installer or add a the link > to the wiki? > > Jeff, any comment here? I can modify the installer to not > have the Tomcat option for M4. I now feel we are better > waiting and providing the Tomcat functionality in an unstable > build from HEAD or M5, working on making it as simple as > possible for the user to configure and provide good > documentation with the installation.
M5 is better IMHO. > > I tried using M4 with Jetty disabled last night and had some > problems (ran out of time to debug.. was getting late). It > may be something I did wrong, see mail thread "Problems > running DebugConsole on Tomcat, with Jetty removed from plans in M4". Probably a small issue with the plans...I could look into it. If we are talking about a mid/end-August M5, we could wait. If you want the final Tomcat plans for M4, I could get that for you as well. What do you think? > > John > > > > > It seems GERONIMO-809 is actually completed, is that right? > > GERONIMO-809 is complete now. JIRA being down prevented me > from completing it last night. > > > > > > THE FINAL STUFF > > > > We have to run the TCK on the final binary, which means we need to > > allow for a couple days of just testing the actual geronimo-1.0- > > M4.zip that people will download. To even get that far, we need to: > > > > 1. [notes] Create release notes for M4 and check them > into the QA > > branch > > 2. [svn] Close the QA branch and copy it to tags/v1_0_M4 > > 3. [dist] Cut and sign the binary and source distributions > > > > We are going to need to be done with the remaining JIRA items above > > by like Wednesday (best) or Thursday morning in order to do > the above > > tasks. > > > > I am willing to take care of the svn and dist work. > Side-note: I have > > to go to a wedding on Friday, so I personally would like to > shoot for > > Wednesday as Thursday night is too late for me. > > > > Aaron, you willing to do the nice release notes like you did for M3? > > > > ==================== > > > > Sound good to everyone? Going to assume a lazy consensus otherwise. > > > > -David > > > > This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, > proprietary or non-public information. This information is intended > solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or > transmission > error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the sender > immediately > and destroy this e-mail. Any review, dissemination, use or > reliance upon > this information by unintended recipients is prohibited. Any > opinions > expressed in this e-mail are those of the author personally. >
