[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-827?page=comments#action_12317112 ]
Jeremy Boynes commented on GERONIMO-827: ---------------------------------------- Do you have one that says they don't? The definition is valid and has semantic meaning (cascade-delete); we should either comply with the definition or reject the application. The name elements are not purely documentation - there are actually <description> elements built into the schema for all these elements that can be used for that. The schema has a unique constraint on the relation name to ensure there are no duplicates, the purpose of which is to allow mapping tools to clearly identify them. > Change CMR mapping name elements to descriptions > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: GERONIMO-827 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-827 > Project: Geronimo > Type: Improvement > Components: OpenEJB > Versions: 1.0-M4 > Reporter: Aaron Mulder > Fix For: 1.0-M5 > > Change the ejb-relation-name and ejb-relationship-role-name elements in > openejb-jar.xml at: > openejb-jar/relationships/ejb-relation/ejb-relation-name > openejb-jar/relationships/ejb-relation/ejb-relationship-role/ejb-relationship-role-name > To be description elements instead, since they're not actually used by the > server and are for documentation purposes only. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira