[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-827?page=comments#action_12317112 
] 

Jeremy Boynes commented on GERONIMO-827:
----------------------------------------

Do you have one that says they don't? The definition is valid and has semantic 
meaning (cascade-delete); we should either comply with the definition or reject 
the application.

The name elements are not purely documentation - there are actually 
<description> elements built into the schema for all these elements that can be 
used for that. 

The schema has a unique constraint on the relation name to ensure there are no 
duplicates, the purpose of which is to allow mapping tools to clearly identify 
them.

> Change CMR mapping name elements to descriptions
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: GERONIMO-827
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-827
>      Project: Geronimo
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: OpenEJB
>     Versions: 1.0-M4
>     Reporter: Aaron Mulder
>      Fix For: 1.0-M5

>
> Change the ejb-relation-name and ejb-relationship-role-name elements in 
> openejb-jar.xml at:
> openejb-jar/relationships/ejb-relation/ejb-relation-name
> openejb-jar/relationships/ejb-relation/ejb-relationship-role/ejb-relationship-role-name
> To be description elements instead, since they're not actually used by the 
> server and are for documentation purposes only.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to