On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> Neither - Geronimo can use whichever version it chooses.

        Um, OK, then I guess Geronimo needs some more information to
decide which to use.  What's the plan for testing and finalizing TranQL
v1.0?  When do you expect that and when do you expect v1.1 to be tested
and finalized?  What other changes are in store for v1.1?  Is OpenEJB
2.0-SHAPSHOT dependent on TranQL 1.1-SNAPSHOT or can OpenEJB also choose
v1.0?  Should this change be backported to TranQL 1.0?

Thanks,
        Aaron

> This change means that 1.1 has a default byte[] binding that stores the 
> data directly in the database rather than generically serializing the 
> array. This is more likely to work with other applications than the 
> serialized form.
> 
> --
> Jeremy
> 

Reply via email to