On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, David Jencks wrote:
> I'm sorry, but I can't understand what you are proposing. Can you
> provide a schema fragment for the elements you want to change?
Old:
<xsd:element name="port" type="gernaming:portType" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
...
<xsd:element name="port" type="gernaming:port-completionType"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
...
<xsd:complexType name="port-completionType">
<xsd:complexContent>
<xsd:extension base="gernaming:portType">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="binding-name" type="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:extension>
</xsd:complexContent>
</xsd:complexType>
New:
<xsd:element name="port" type="gernaming:portType" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
...
<xsd:element name="port-completion" type="gernaming:port-completionType"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
...
<xsd:complexType name="port-completionType">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="port" type="gernaming:portType"/>
<xsd:element name="binding-name" type="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
For further clarification, look at
http://chariotsolutions.com/geronimo/images/geronimo-openejb-serviceref.png
and observe how the top "port" element and the bottom "port" element have
slightly different content.
Aaron
> On Aug 2, 2005, at 5:19 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
> > So our our naming schema, when dealing with web services, has an
> > unfortunate overlap with two different "port" elements that are
> > subtlely
> > different:
> >
> > <service-ref>
> > <service-ref-name />
> > <service-completion>
> > <service-name />
> > <port> (def #1, portCompletionType)
> > (contents of port #2)
> > <binding-name />
> > </port>
> > </service-completion>
> > <port> (def #2)
> > ...
> > </port>
> > </service-ref>
> >
> > In other words, the first "port" element contains all the same
> > stuff as the second "port" element plus one extra element.
> >
> > I think it would be preferable to have what's currently the first
> > "port" look like this:
> >
> > <port-completion>
> > <port ... />
> > <binding-name />
> > </port-completion>
> >
> > That way both "port" elements would be identical.
> >
> > Any objections to making this change in M5?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Aaron
> >
>
>
