Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 8/3/2005 1:57 PM:
On Aug 3, 2005, at 4:14 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:04:22AM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
There is never going to be another release from the M4-QA branch.
It's a dead branch and shouldn't be updated after we vote to release
the M4 binaries.
Why wouldn't we set a process that's standard and stick with it?
Further, it's entirely reasonable to keep our option open for a
subsequent release of M4. Remember M3? And what if we find a major
problem? We don't want to ram forward a M5 - we'd want to fix M4 and
get that out there, retracting the problematic release, say a M4r1.
This makes sense to me.
Regards,
Alan
