This is definitely a bug. The J2EE 1.4 specification section J2EE.8.1 states:

"A JAR format file (such as a .jar file, .war file, or .rar file) can reference a .jar file by naming the referenced .jar file in a Class-Path header in the referencing JAR file’s Manifest file. The referenced .jar file is named using a URL relative to the URL of the referencing JAR file. The Manifest file is named META-INF/ MANIFEST.MF in the JAR file. The Class-Path entry in the Manifest file is of the form"

    Class-Path:list-of-jar-files-separated-by-spaces

"The J2EE deployment tools must process all such referenced files when processing a J2EE module. Any deployment descriptors in referenced .jar files are ignored when processing the referencing .jar file. The deployment tool must install the .jar files in a way that preserves the relative references between the files. Typically this is done by installing the .jar files into a directory hierarchy that matches the original application directory hierarchy. All referenced .jar files must appear in the logical class path of the referencing JAR files at runtime." "Only JAR format files containing class files or resources to be loaded directly by a standard ClassLoader should be the target of a Class-Path reference; such files are always named with a .jar extension. Top level JAR files that are processed by a deployment tool should not contain Class-Path entries; such entries would, by definition, reference other files external to the deployment unit. A deployment tool is not required to process such external references."


I am surprised this was not caught by the TCK. This I'm going to mark this issues as a "Blocker" since our server is non-compliant until we fix this bug.

-dain

On Aug 14, 2005, at 11:20 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:

From your explanation, it appears you are just deploying a war. If this is the case, why are you writing a "Class-Path" in the MANIFEST.MF? If you store the jar The WEB-INF/lib, the server should pick it up. The "Class-Path:" in the MANIFEST.MF is really only when you are using an EAR. Your Class-Path is telling the server to look for it in $GERONIMO_HOME/config-store/17/lib1.jar and $GERONIMO_HOME/config-store/17/lib/lib2.jar. I would gather to say this is probably a configuration issue. Place your jars in WEB- INF/lib and remove the "Class-Path:" from your MANIFEST.MF.

Bernd Fondermann (JIRA) wrote:

Jasper TldLocationsCache initialization fails ----------------------------------------------
         Key: GERONIMO-878
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-878
     Project: Geronimo
        Type: Bug
Components: deployment Versions: 1.0-M4 Reporter: Bernd Fondermann When requesting a JSP page of a geronimo-deployed WAR, I get the following exception: org.apache.jasper.JasperException: Unable to initialize TldLocationsCache: $GERONIMO_HOME/config-store/17/lib1.jar The webapp contains a META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file with a line like that:
    Class-Path: lib1.jar lib/lib2.jar
I debugged into Jasper2 and found the following:
* The code throwing the exception is in TldLocationsCache.scanJars (), called from init() * This method is triggered at JSP compilation time, but only for pages containing <%@ taglib ... %> directives
* At first, the JettyClassLoader is doing its stuff
* Second, its parent, o.a.g.kernel.config.ConfigurationClassLoader takes over * TldLocationsCache iterates the 2 libs from the Manifest file as returned by ConfigurationClassLoader.getURLs()
* The URLs as returned by the CL are
   $GERONIMO_HOME/config-store/17/lib1.jar
   $GERONIMO_HOME/config-store/17/lib/lib2.jar
* But, the files are in fact stored under
   $GERONIMO_HOME/config-store/17/war/WEB-INF/lib1.jar
   $GERONIMO_HOME/config-store/17/war/WEB-INF/lib/lib2.jar
* This causes a FileNotFoundException which is wrapped into the JasperException * If the config-store is manipulated (while running the server) to contain these two files at the requested location, everything works fine from then on * Of course, the downside of this manipulation is, that deployment fails at next server startup


Reply via email to