[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MMS-Smtp-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1 X-MMS-Smtp-Auth: Authenticated As [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MMS-Smtp-Mailer-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1
I'm trying to get my head around maven and the like so at least for me this is the best way to learn it. I'll volunteer to help. - Matt Bruce Snyder wrote: >On 8/17/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>I think we should consider choosing appropriate timing - it sounds >>like a big effort, and how does this fit into what we want to do w/ >>M5, 1.0, etc I was going to suggest voting on even doing this, but I >>can't imagine that at *some* point in the future, we don't want to be >>on M2, so we will go there eventually. it's just a matter of when... >> >> > >Is there ever an appropriate time to overhaul the build? Not really. > >Is the proposed change in the best interest of the project and the >community? Yes. > >Will this change be ready for release in M5? Good question ;-). I >don't think this can be determined without digging in a bit. > >Are the people who have thrown their hat into the ring for working on >this effort on the hook for any M5 related work that takes a higher >priority? I'd like to get GERONIMO-693 and GERONIMO-871 tested and >committed. Only after that will I begin work on the converstion to m2. > >Bruce > >
