Is the Javamail provider implementation an optional portion of the J2EE
specification? J2EE 1.4 states
"The JavaMail API specification does not require any specific protocol
providers, but the JavaMail reference implementation includes an
IMAP message store provider and an SMTP message transport provider."
Nonetheless, is it still useful to have default providers available in
geronimo? Seems like both applications and the new javamail portlet
could take advantage of them..
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I'm not sure where they went... I'll have to find them..
On Aug 15, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Chris Cardona wrote:
Can you give more information about this SMTP service
provider or you can just point me where to find some
info.
The patch is for the Java Mail portlet for the console
and part of it is a way to send out test messages. The
service providers are also needed if an application
wants to use the mail sessions created from the Java
Mail portlet.
Thanks,
chris
--- "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 12, 2005, at 2:16 AM, Chris Cardona wrote:
Does Geronimo have its own implementation of
JavaMail
service providers like SMTP, POP3, IMAP, etc.? If
I
We have SMTP
want to send a patch that relies on sending some
test
mail and I don’t want to use Sun’s JavaMail SMTP
service provider what are my options?
Do you mean your patch for something wants to send
mail?
Thanks for any help/suggestion.
Chris
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home
page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
--
Geir Magnusson Jr
+1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
