> -----Original Message----- > The first would result in a configuration that could run on > any web container, the last two would produce configurations > that would run on a specific web container. Applications > would typically use the first form unless they needed > container-specific functionality (which would also mean that > they needed that specific container at runtime). > > I included the namespace qualifiers for clarity. I believe > that suitable use of schema imports would mean that they > could be removed simplifying the XML form used by users. It > may be harder for us to implement, but I think ease-of-use is > more important here than ease-of-implementation. > > -- > Jeremy >
Everything you proposed is fine with me except for forcing the namespace for one container. I think we should have a universal web plan that will be accepted under both containers. So I would ask that we allow the generic file to be allowed to include both a jetty and tomcat name space. This will make our applications, like the console and debugtool to have 1 geronimo-web.xml per app. IMHO this is a much simpler way to manage the apps that must run under both containers. I believe this is how DJ implemented it. Jeff
