Yes, 909 needs to be checked in and 884 can be checked in now also.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
899 : Done
884 : needs to be submitted under the Apache license
885 : done
907 : done
902 : done
what about 909?
On Aug 24, 2005, at 6:38 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Patches? We don't need no steenkeeng patches...
884 - please resubmit and grant ASF license
885 - I couldn't get this to apply successfully. I'm not sure why.
Most chunks failed.
888 - done
907 - failed like 885. I figured I'm doing something wrong, but
it's just not obvious.
geir
On Aug 23, 2005, at 5:34 PM, Sachin Patel wrote:
Add 907 to the list. Thanks.
Sachin Patel wrote:
Would one of the committers mind checking in the patches for
884,885, and 888? I'm making changes on source files that already
have existing pending patches in these jiras and don't want to
introduce new patches until their checked to avoid conflicts when
merging. For my knowledge, how is this handled? Are cumulative
patches easily handled? i.e What happens if i have Patch-A based
on revision 1 on File-A. Then I introduce Patch-B on File-A also
based on revision 1 (but includes changes that went into Patch
A). Since both of the patches are based on the same revision # I
would assume that only one of the patches can be applied without
errors or conflicts. What happens when the second patch is
applied since the patch is no longer based on the revision
specified in the patch file? If the second patch cannot be
applied, how is one expected to know which patch to throw out?
Thanks.
Sachin.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
