Re: M5 Time ;-)

[Joe Bohn]

I don't have the history to answer your last question ... perhaps somebody else can. As to what is Jetty specific in the console .... it may be not as bad as I think it is ....(I'm just now about to configure tomcat and see what happens).  However, as I look in the code for the web server and connection management I see many instances where special processing is done for Jetty but not Tomcat.   Perhaps none is necessary for Tomcat?  There is a log viewer portlet that is Jetty Specific and I don't see another equivalent for Tomcat. Other posts have indicated problems with the console and tomcat ... but they may have already been fixed.   I'll find out soon :-)  . Joe Bruce Snyder wrote: On 8/26/05, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Of course this is required in Geronimo R1 .... and I think it is also required in M5. However, based upon some of the comments around certification of Tomcat, I thought I should ask if everyone felt that this was necessary for M5. Thanks for the clarification, Joe. Now I understand that your comments are aimed at M5 only. That being said, what exactly is missing? And why was the choice made to develop the console in such a Jetty specific manner? Bruce -- Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose." -- Jim Elliot