This sounds like a maintenance rathole.
Do any of the things we use actually require this? Can we just not
do this in the console? Or pull in the license, notice and copyright
files in the root?
geir
On Aug 30, 2005, at 6:19 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Can you put that comment on the JIRA issue?
I guess the question becomes, do we want the console to show all
licenses for all products that Geronimo uses, or just the licenses
for the
products that the console itself requires.
Aaron
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Jeff Genender wrote:
Do not remove the jar..
The JDBM *is* a Geronimo dependency now...Apache Directory needs it.
Aaron Mulder (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-879?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-879:
----------------------------------
Fix Version: 1.0
Currently the Geronimo repository does include JDBM:
repository/jdbm/jars/jdbm-0.20-dev.jar
We should probably remove the JAR and ensure it doesn't cause
problems before removing the license. Do you know what JDBM was
used for?
The console inclusion of a license for JDBM is obsolete.
--------------------------------------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-879
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-879
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: console
Versions: 1.0-M5
Environment: All.
Reporter: Rick McGuire
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.0
Attachments: jdbm.diff
The about jsp page for the console includes a license link for
JDBM. The JDBM component is no longer a Geronimo dependency, so
this should be removed and the accompanying JDBM_license.txt
file removed.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
