David Jencks wrote:
...
I wrote a namespace-driven switching module builder to determine if the
jetty or tomcat builder is used. It has a defaultNamespace option
which is what currently determines the target. The module builders
register themselves with the switch and supply their namespace.
...
So, in more detail, I propose we ship:
-all the configurations, for both jetty and tomcat, installed
- 3 pairs of config.list and config.xml files that run both, only jetty,
and only tomcat
- both containers and builders running by default.
Hi Dave,
Both, by default? Interesting. Will there be a way in your proposal to
deploy a WAR to *both* containers? Since the defaultNamespace option is
to drive what container a WAR is deployed to I think the answer is
negative, isn't it? (or alternatively it could assume that no
defaultNamespace would mean both) If so, why would a user want to run
Jetty and Tomcat? I don't mind having two containers and builders
running at the same time, but wonder if there's a user case for it (a
web hosting provider?).
david jencks
Jacek