[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1015?page=comments#action_12329700 ]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-1015: ------------------------------------ Aaron. Thanks for taking a look at this patch. Regarding your comments: - The proposal did remove the hard coded object names from being required within the console code. Are you concerned about them still being in the container specific implementation (under o/a/g/jetty in this case)? - Good points about remote access and inclusion in the JSR77 namespace. The problem with requiring the helper to be a GBean itself is that it requires the admin portlets to be conversant in GBeans which seems like a fairly deep part of the infrastructure to expose at the application level. - This proposal doesn't require the EAR to reference Jetty as a parent. The Console EAR has always included jetty as a parent and will until we convert all jetty specific portlets of which this is only one. - yeah ... I figured that would be the case since most folks don't like this style of argument formatting. I personally find it to be very easy to read and modify (much more so than the traditional blob approach). However, I will conform to the style of the project. > Management API: Web Logging > --------------------------- > > Key: GERONIMO-1015 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1015 > Project: Geronimo > Type: Improvement > Components: management > Versions: 1.0-M4 > Environment: all > Reporter: Joe Bohn > Assignee: Aaron Mulder > Attachments: logging2.patch > > Management API for working with Web Logs and implementation for jetty > integrated with console. Intergration with tomcat hopefully soon to follow. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
