On Sep 19, 2005, at 10:53 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Sep 20, 2005, at 12:50 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Alright guys, we're talking over each other again and are too far
down in the details.
This entire thing started as Geir wanted to do 1.0-M5.1, 1.0-M5.2,
1.0-M5.3, ... 1.0-M5.N while we all work on 1.0-M6 (or whatever).
What? That's completely untrue.
This entire thing started because I couldn't figure out the sense
of deleting a branch from underneath a tag and wanted us to have a
standard process for branch/tag/release regardless of what our
naming convention is.
Ok, I apologize. Very sorry.
To everyone reading, we still need to decide what page we are on in
terms of if now is the time to put a stake in the sand. Obviously
the process for a "tag" and a "branch" is not the same.
So where are we at? Are we branching for stability now or tagging
our way to a codebase we are willing to maintain as stable?
-David
