On Sep 20, 2005, at 10:29 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Anyway, there's one other thing to think about - When do we want to
make a release that we are willing to support?
Been trying to get that conversation going. What are you're thoughts?
On Sep 19, 2005, at 9:50 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Are we going to put a stake in the sand now and start doing minor
revisions (patch only, no new features) on this release... or are
we going to wait till some time in the future?
I am totally cool with whatever, but we have to get on the same
page first.
If we decide to put a stake in the sand now and branch off a
stabilization effort, we will need to define at least at a high
level what "stable" means to us in terms of the actual code,
functionality, and files that comprise our software. There must be
some common yardstick on which we measure stable/unstable.
On Sep 20, 2005, at 12:03 AM, David Blevins wrote:
[...] we still need to decide what page we are on in terms of if
now is the time to put a stake in the sand. Obviously the process
for a "tag" and a "branch" is not the same.
So where are we at? Are we branching for stability now or tagging
our way to a codebase we are willing to maintain as stable?
