On Sep 20, 2005, at 11:39 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 9/20/2005 10:42 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I think we're losing the svn meaning of trunk/branches. I think
we either need to keep stuff under trunk or for each subproject have
geronimo/contrib/trunk
geronimo/examples/trunk
geronimo/specs/trunk
geronimo/devtools/trunk
etc.
for some thinks such as sandbox trunk may not seem to make much
sense but I think we should keep it anyway for consistent structure.
It was my understanding that we would have such SVN artifacts but
that adding it to the proposal would have made it too unweldy or
that Dain was too lazy to put them in; I believe that it was the
latter.
I would love to say they they were too unweldy, but I simply forgot
about that aspect entirely :)
Anyway, we would need trunk, branches, and tags dirs where ever we
wanted to create revisions, so we wouldn't want them for sandbox or
contrib, but we would want them under examples, specs, and devtools.
-dain
