On Sep 21, 2005, at 12:13 AM, David Jencks wrote:
My concern is primarily with the geronimo plan. While presumably
the app itself isn't going to need to change to be deployed to
other app servers, I expect each server to need a separate plan.
Wouldn't that be part of the DayTrader project to maintain, since
they know what they need to deploy, and that may change over time?
I was thinking we'd keep the app and geronimo plan together in
synch with the geronimo version. Obviously this is not ideal, but
I haven't thought of a better solution. Maybe have the app
separate and a module in geronimo/apps to build a configuration for
the current geronimo version?
Or just force the people working on DayTrader to follow, or stablize
our plan :)
I see what you're saying.
(My biggest concern with asking the question was to see if it was
because people had different ideas about how "heavy" a subproject was.)
geir
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 20, 2005, at 11:59 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I'm just curious what people expect to happen here. I'm happy
to go with the flow, but at least want to understand the flow.
DayTrader is an application that is used as a performance tool for
any J2EE server, so it's not Geronimo only. (Contrast that with
the console, as an example.) It makes little sense to me to tie
it to Geronimo releases no matter what the stability of Geronimo.
We can use it to measure Geronimo against other servers, and
should use it daily to ensure that we don't regress performance-
wise. To do that, I think we'd want to have a released version of
it, so we could at compare apples to apples. The tools can't vary
freely and randomly with the code we're trying to test.... Matt
would have a better perspective, I guess.
Instead of a new subproject, which people seem to find a bad idea
for reasons I don't grok - as it's just out of SVN trunk, has
separate release cycles from G server, and has some mention on the
website - how about at least putting it into devtools? Can we
avoid adding to the clutter of trunk, something we seemed to
support earlier today?
geir
On Sep 20, 2005, at 8:48 PM, David Blevins wrote:
+1 Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
-1 Do not create Applications subproject. Leave in trunk.
On Sep 20, 2005, at 4:28 PM, John Sisson wrote:
> (Keep it simple for now. Review this later when Geronimo is
more stable. I think
> it is too early to try to have applications with their own
release cycle)
Well put.
-David
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
