I apologize for being so sloppy today. :-( I do see config.xml.bak in the zip distribution.
--- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Never mind, it is being created later. > > Thanks > Anita > > --- anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > --- "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Oct 5, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Oct 5, 2005, at 11:01 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I think there's two different types of > > problems > > > here that are > > > >>> being confused. > > > >>> > > > >>> The first is a few configuration issues with > > the > > > zip image that > > > >>> Stefan (in the tomcat config.xml) and Matt > > (with > > > the TranQL and > > > >>> DB2) have discovered. There may be more of > > > these but these > > > >>> types of issues that arise but they are > *not* > > > issues which 100% > > > >>> of customers will hit. For these types of > > > problems I think that > > > >>> an errata on the download page should > suffice > > > (with individual > > > >>> replacement modules and directions). > > > > In geronimo-1.0-M5.zip I see a > > config.xml.bak! > > This issue will not affect anyone one. > > > > Thanks > > Anita > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> The second is another issue that Stefan > > > discovered which > > > >>> involves the installer. This is the type > of > > > thing that can > > > >>> affect a lot of users and may be something > > that > > > would cause us > > > >>> to create an M6. However, since the > > installer > > > is itself a > > > >>> unique download do we really have to build > > > another M6 to replace > > > >>> it? Can't we just build a new installer > off > > > the M5 image with > > > >>> changes to the installer alone that should > > not > > > affect the TCK > > > >>> results? If possible I think this would be > a > > > better solution > > > >>> than dropping it completely from M5. > > > >>> > > > >> I don't think we're advocating dropping it - > > just > > > redoing it... > > > >> > > > > > > > > I meant potentially dropping it from M5 (as > > Kevan > > > alluded to) ... > > > > not from history. :-) > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> Another idea would be to just add some very > > "in > > > your face" > > > >>> statements around the download link for the > > > installer itself. > > > >>> Does Apache regulate what you can and > cannot > > > include on the > > > >>> download page? > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> The geronimo download page is governed by the > > > project. How "in > > > >> your face" are you thinking here? > > > >> Probably don't want "If you use this, your > > > (@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@-ed, and if you > > > >> don't like it, you can go *(@[EMAIL PROTECTED]@!#)[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > >> :D > > > >> > > > > > > > > I wasn't thinking that kind of "in your face" > > :-) > > > Rather, > > > > something along the lines of: > > > > %link% this is an executable JAR, so install > > it > > > using java -jar > > > > geronimo-1.0-M5-installer.jar. > > > > WARNING: If no selections are made in the > > > installation both > > > > containers will be included with common > > > (colliding) port numbers. > > > > It is recommended that you choose either > > > Tomcat-only, Jetty-only, > > > > or explicitly specify the ports for each > > > container. > > > > > > Sure! That's easy. But isn't there another > > problem > > > w/ the > > > installer? Can we put the additional errata > > there? > > > > > > geir > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> geir > > > >> > > > >>> Joe > > > >>> > > > >>> Kevan Miller wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>>> Without a really big disclaimer on the > > download > > > page, my guess > > > >>>> is that approximately 100% of > > new-to-Geronimo > > > M5 Installer > > > >>>> users will run into this problem. All you > > have > > > to do is keep > > > >>>> hitting "Next". I did. I just never > started > > my > > > "installed" > > > >>>> server, because I'd already tested the > > > zipped/tarred version of > > > >>>> code (my mistake). > > > >>>> I don't think an errata is sufficient and I > > > don't see how we > > > >>>> can ignore such a visible issue. This may > be > > a > > > bit heretical, > > > >>>> but one option is not to release the > > > installer. Although this > > > >>>> is a server issue, you don't hit this > > problem > > > in normal usage > > > >>>> when running from an zip/tar "install" (at > > > least I haven't run > > > >>>> into any other problems, am I missing > > > something?). > > > >>>> Most first-time users will choose the > install > > > download thinking > > > >>>> they're making their lives easier, when > > > actually, they've just > > > >>>> made their lives more difficult. Although > > some > > > last-minute hard > > > >>>> work went into the installer, IMO, the M5 > > > installer is of > > > >>>> limited value for first-time Geronimo > users. > > I > > > also think that > > > >>>> the current installer is actually a > > > configuration utility in > > > >>>> disguise -- we should start separating > > > concerns... > > > >>>> BTW, I assume that actually fixing the > > > underlying problem means > > > >>>> rerunning the TCK tests? Thus the reticence > > for > > > fixing? > > > >>>> --kevan > > > >>>> On 10/5/05, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > >>>> On Oct 5, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Matt > Hogstrom > === message truncated === __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com
