Hi there.
Integration with the CORBA stuff would indeed take several weeks; and
then after that we need to grind it through the TCK. So I don't
think we can finish all this before the proposed cut-off 3 weeks from
now.
I've been down with pneumonia for the last 3+ weeks, so things have
been at a standstill here with regards to new development. Today is
my first day back to work, and I'm preparing for OSCON in Amsterdam
tomorrow. I'm looking forward to meet some of you!
Kresten Krab Thorup
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We do not inherit the Earth from our parents, we borrow it from our
children." Saint Exupery
On Oct 14, 2005, at 4:34 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Trifork has been silent for a few weeks. I think at this point the
integration work would require several weeks but I'm probably not
the best person to estimate the time.
Perhaps the Trifork folks can comment. Anyone ?
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 10/13/05, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I sent an e-mail out about a week ago on what people thought
about getting
Geronimo 1.0 out for Apache Con coming up in December. I've
heard back from a
few folks and the feedback has been generally positive. There
are a lot of
things we'd like to get done in terms of new feature / function
and if we wait
until Geronimo is complete with all the cool stuff it will be a
while before we
cut a 1.0 branch.
I think it would be sweet to finish this year out by saying we
hit a 1.0 release
and Apache Con seems to be a good point to make the
announcement. So the
question is what do we need to get done to say 1.0 is ready?
So to kick off the discussion here we go ...
I included a brief calender below of the time we have between now
and Apache Con
to try and figure out how much gas there was to get things done.
I figure we
have a little over 3 weeks to get our work done before we cut a
branch and start
testing / verifying it. I assumed that Thanksgiving week would
be a bust for
most people so I took it out of the available time. That leaves
about three
weeks for CTS testing and resolving issues. Thoughts on whether
this makes any
sense or not? I wrote my thoughts on what I figured was
important for us in
terms of users accepting the server and using it. Not sure how
to get these
things done and I expect I'm missing a ton of things.
Let the adventure begin...
Feature list for 1.0
Console - focus on ensuring console is functional
Statement cache in TranQL - Improve JDBC performance
Installer for Geronimo (allow for selection of Web Container :)
Performance testing and fixes
Testing for stability
Usability (testing deploy of apps and customer experience)
DayTrader face lift and documentation
What's the status of the interop/ORB stuff?
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D
\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
