No, I'm currently not working on it, and I don't think John S is either
right now. This is a good question, but I say go for it. The only
technical reason I can think at the top of my head to keep the 1.x based
version is for eclipse tooling integration, as WTP currently supports
the 1.x xdoclet runtimes. I'm not sure wether they have plans to
support 2.x runtime for WTP 1.0. I can ask them. If so, then perhaps
there is no need to support both versions. Also how much easier is it
to develop XDoclet 2 plugins from a build perspective? Do you think some
of the questions John posted in an earlier thread can be answered easer
with XDoclet2? (i.e can you build without the source?)
Sachin.
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sachin,
If you could help out that would be great as I probably won't have a
lot of time over the next few weeks to work on this.
If you download Xdoclet 1.2.2 source and build the geronimo module,
you end up with a xdoclet-geronimo-module-1.2.2.jar file in target/lib.
Hi,
I'm writing a doc about developing an XDoclet2 plugin and would be
glad to take Geronimo plugin as a sample. Is anyone working on it?
Sachin? I don't want to step on anybody's toes with migrating the code
to XDoclet2 since it's 1.x-based. Do you think it's worth to maintain
two versions of the plugin for XD1 and XD2? Unless I'm mistaken they
would be completely different.
John
Jacek
