I'm coming in kind of late on this one (been fighting with continuum
all day)... but it seems like the conversation somehow got polarized
between remove vs. keep and the proposal is simply to move them (as
far as I can tell).
So, here is my thoughts ...
We have to move old binaries off the mirrors and over to
cvs.apache.org at some point (i think that's where they go anyway).
I'm cool with moving the corresponding tag to an archive place in svn
at the same time. There is a certain kind of symmetry in that which
is attractive.
So +1 to archiving the tag when we yank binaries off the mirrors. (I
understand that's kind of a modified version of the proposal, so if
you like the addition, throw a +1 on it for clarity)
I'm not a fan of deleting tags from the repo entirely as svn has this
cool "cheap copy" concept and I don't see any reason not to take
advantage.
-David
On Oct 31, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
It's messy and there is no good reason to keep them.
I won't argue with messy, but I *will* dispute 'no good
reason to keep them.' In fact, I already have. :-)
- --
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQCVAwUBQ2a6dZrNPMCpn3XdAQITvAP/b40SsfuretAfikORDk2Uct3jaV59b9DB
5B+JthfqK20BC4PO48oLT+6uf727p9i3WHuh10+wjN/Aer6mijQyISZjAbBR137w
AZTRlVEgEeihomy8ca9aTpFhd8MrahjUKvgDRSCSoX5pJUtT6II/PVMnst3yKPs9
UNI9KHyqZ4U=
=WzgK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
