On Nov 1, 2005, at 3:32 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
<aside>
next time, can you put the old subject in the subject like "[vote]
foo (was : what do you thing about foo?)" as I think this will be
a confusing thing in mail archives later...
</aside>
Will do.
I do think it's a great idea to have a place for Geronimo-centric
build scripts and related documentation. And a subproject is fine,
because I think of that as a way of neatly organizing the project
to make it easy for people to find things, and for us to manage
things.
But I don't really understand what gbuild is yet. Is this really
Geronimo-centered, or broader with Geronimo as a piece?
Pretty much what you describe above. A very generic, Geronimo-
centric, build/test initiative. The idea is still pretty soft and
what we do in it is really up to us. No master plan other than
building/testing has been a bane on the project since day one and
this is an attempt to get a lot of momentum behind solving that
problem in a community-lead fashion.
I'm really excited to see where we can take it and what we can make
from it all.
Was there any thought given to Ken's suggestion of working with
Gump since they do similar things?
I'm personally happy to work with anyone. We are working really
closely with Continuum already.
If this is appropriate for G, I have no problem with a subproject,
and hope you can answer the question above.
+1
Great!
Thanks,
David
On Nov 1, 2005, at 3:36 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Seems like everyone likes the idea, so let me recap into an actual
vote thread and just take the liberty of moving the +1s in.
+1s Jeff, Bruce, Matt, David J, Dain, John
0s Alan
No -1s so far.
Going to throw myself into the +1 group.
-David
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
