On Nov 2, 2005, at 11:19 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 11/2/05, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guys, you are totally agreeing. To paraphrase Dain, "It should be
fine to create a branch from a tag, forget CVS dogma." To paraphrase
Bruce, "If we need to updated a tag, move it to the branches dir at
that point, so it's not a tag anymore."
I think we're in agreement as well.
And my thoughts are the same as well, "If we need to update a tag for
some unknow reason in the future, let's move it (or copy it with a
new name) to the branches directory at that point."
One minor clarification. IMO, tags should remain intact forever.
Therefore a tag should be copied to the branches dir, not moved. But I
digress... ;-).
Awesome. That's my preference as well, just didn't want to be
inflexible and wasn't sure if you meant "therefore be moved" as in
"svn move".
Can you +1 my proposal for clarity?
Thanks,
David
