Yeah, I'd thought about putting it in Daemon (I probably would have forgotten/not known about CommandLine). And what you propose is the correct solution, I think. By delaying until Deploy time, we leak ~ 20 URLJarFiles (I don't know how much memory) and it better guards us for any future uses of URLJarFile. Creating a "dummy" URL to set the UseCaches default just felt like such a <hack>. Putting it in DeploymentUtil put the hack close to where it was needed -- I was somehow comforted by this...

I'll work up the CommandLine and Daemon changes...

--kevan

On 11/11/05, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe we should put this in the CommandLine class in the static block
at the top, and in Daemon line 153.  Basically before we initialize
the logging system.  These are the places where we put global
initialization code.  Actually now that I think about it, it would be
nice to have a single place we put this type of static global
initialization code.

-dain

On Nov 11, 2005, at 8:50 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:

> Comments????
>
> How about nice work! ;-)
>
> I don't see any issues.  If the others don't see problems, I will
> be happy to apply your patch...just assign it to me.
>
> Jeff
>
> Kevan Miller wrote:
>> As I mentioned previously, there is a memory leak of URLJarFile
>> instances in
>> Geronimo. The problem is caused by
>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4167874 --
>> sun.net.www.protocol.jar.JarFileFactory will hold onto strong
>> references to
>> all URLJarFile instances. So URLJarFiles can never be GCed. This
>> means that
>> for every deploy/undeploy of an application, you'll leak URLJarFiles.
>> The problem can be avoided by calling
>> URLConnection.setDefaultUseCaches(false);
>> This will turn off the caching in JarFileFactory. I added a call to
>> setDefaultUseCaches() to DeploymentUtil.readAll() and verified
>> that Geronimo
>> no longer leaks URLJarFile instances.
>> Note that setDefaultUseCaches(false) is a "global" setting. So it
>> affects
>> the entire runtime. URLConnection.setUseCaches(false) does not fix
>> the
>> problem. Since, there is the potential for a performance impact, I
>> thought
>> I'd advertise the issue. I don't see any usages within Geronimo
>> code where
>> this would cause major problems. However, there may be issues
>> which I'm not
>> realizing...
>> Comments? Barring concerns, I'll raise a Jira and post a patch.
>> --kevan


Reply via email to