Pluto's dependency is currently listed as: 0.9.5.3
I think 0.9.9 is from something else. David On 11/16/05, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 16, 2005, at 8:20 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > > > Of the 14 missing jars, I was able to track down all but 5. I had some > > Qs about those 5 - > > > > castor ||castor || 0.9.9 || 0.9.9.1 exists. Update pom to use this ? > what is using castor? I think pluto is, anything else? > > > org.apache.geronimo.fake ||m2assembly || 1.0-SNAPSHOT || ??? > no idea... obviously it is supposed to be something we control... > > > activemq || activemq-core-test || 3.2 || can't trace this yet. > I doubt we actually need this, can you figure out what tries to pull it > in? > > > javacc || javacc || 2.1 || [WARNING] This artifact has been relocated > > to javax.sql:jdbc-stdext:2.0. > It seems to me that this must be a mistake somewhere. > > > xmlbeans || xmlbeans-jsr173-api || 2.0-dev || can't trace this yet. > for the m1 build we are using stax/jars/stax-api-1.0.jar. Again, can > you trace where this requirement comes from? Is there a generic m2 > tool to trace where missing dependencies are required? > > thanks > david jencks > > > > > > Suggestions ? Advice ? > > > > Cheers > > Prasad > > > > On 11/11/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi David, > >> > >> Certainly, they should be put into the main repository (via an > >> evangelism issue). For the specs ones, these are probably older than > >> trunk that has the poms - but I'd expect them to be the same or > >> similar - so definitely use those. They'll still need to be uploaded. > >> > >> - Brett > >> > >> On 11/12/05, David Jencks < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > On Nov 11, 2005, at 11:00 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > >> > > >> > > I'm done creating poms for the 17 modules in the attached text > >> file. > >> > > > >> > >I was able to get some jars (same version and all) from the M1 > >> > > repository. I need to track down the other jars. > >> > > > >> > >Next I need to figure out how to create a patch from the > >> repository > >> > > jars. TortoiseSVN doesn't seem to help me there. Any tips here > >> would > >> > > be appreciated. > >> > > > >> > >Should I create 1 JIRA for all these 17 modules or should each > >> module > >> > > have it's own JIRA ? > >> > > > >> > >Cheers > >> > >Prasad > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > I'm worriedthat duplicate work is happening. The geronimo-specs > >> > already have an m2 build so I wouldthink they all have valid m2 > >> poms. > >> > I believe jeff genender has valid activemq poms from his work with > >> > wadi. > >> > > >> > I certainly don't know what should happen with these poms now that > >> they > >> > exist.I don't think keeping them private to geronimo is likely to > >> be > >> > the best practice.Should we open one issue/pom in maven > >> evangelism? > >> > Jason? Brett? > >> > > >> > thanks > >> > david jencks > >> > > >> > > >
