James, Could we expect any help, in any form, in any of the WS-* projects? i guess not, from your email it is very clear that the involvement you think about would be just a drop-in replacement for other things and not much more. I thought for a few moments that since there is SO much WS-* focus in JBI, there could be lots of areas for cooperation. Sigh!! We'll live. If you think of something else, you know where to reach us.
Team, FYI, As i mentioned previously (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.geronimo.devel/18601) for any future J2EE implementation of Geronimo JAX-WS is needed and we (WS folks) need help with its implementation. thanks, dims On 11/18/05, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 18 Nov 2005, at 17:50, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > [ ] +0 = I don't mind either way > > > > ServiceMix folks have not shown much interest in any WS projects at > > Apache though I have seen their interest in so many non-Apache WS > > projects including Celtix and JAX-WS RI (example see > > http://mail-archive.objectweb.org/celtix-dev/2005-08/msg00112.html). > > We're waiting patiently for JAX-WS support in Axis before we can use > it along with the other 2 JAX-WS implementations. Using SAAJ was a no > brainer for Axis 1 and didn't require any email traffic since it all > just worked. > > > I > > don't really know why Axis and Synapse are mentioned on the proposal. > > We've already said before on the incubator list that we'd like to add > JBI support to Synapse and ensure that we can deploy Synapse inside > ServiceMix as a JBI component. Also when there's a working JAX-WS > provider in Axis we'll give it a good going over in ServiceMix as > well. That's just for starters; who knows what other collaboration > there might be with other WS projects in the future. > > > > Anyway, Best of luck with incubation. >
