|
Aaron Mulder wrote: I believe that current implementation would never give a duplicate value if you search using say, "memberOf" and searching the other way using "memberUID", unless the directory server contains that duplicate group assignments. I would assume that LDAP administators would opt to choose to implement a single grouping mechanism rather than combining the uses of all the possible configurations for assigning members to a group. With that, the ldap login module will only have to choose between "userRoleName" or "roleSearchMatching" , and on extreme cases, both.Hah! I thought this LDAP module was pretty complicated. I just looked at the WebLogic OpenLDAP login module. It has *40* different settings. :)But anyway, with what little I know, I agree with Jeff -- will there ever be a case where you can look up groups for the user using something like "memberOf" and you wouldn't get the same information if you search the other way, for groups where that user was listed as a member in the group record? This is not supported in the current implementation. For dynamic grouping, the returned attribute value should be an LDAP URL rather than a distinguished name and will be handled differently than the userRoleName.WebLogic talked about something called "dynamic groups" which I gether means there's not actually a group entry for the group in LDAP, so maybe the userRoleName could be used to detect those? Cata Aaron On 11/20/05, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |
- Re: Who understands the LDAP login module? Catalino Pineda Jr.
- Re: Who understands the LDAP login module? Aaron Mulder
- Re: Who understands the LDAP login module? Catalino Pineda Jr.
- Re: Who understands the LDAP login module? Jeff Genender
- Re: Who understands the LDAP login module? Hernan Cunico
