[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: adc
Date: Mon Dec 12 23:39:50 2005
New Revision: 356499

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=356499&view=rev
Log:
made a copy

Added:
    geronimo/specs/branches/1_0/
      - copied from r356497, geronimo/specs/trunk/


Would it be better to use the same naming convention for the specs branch as for the geronimo kernel, geronimo/specs/branches/1.0?

foolish consistency and hobgoblins not withstanding :)

Bill

Reply via email to