[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: adc Date: Mon Dec 12 23:39:50 2005 New Revision: 356499URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=356499&view=rev Log: made a copy Added: geronimo/specs/branches/1_0/ - copied from r356497, geronimo/specs/trunk/
Would it be better to use the same naming convention for the specs branch as for the geronimo kernel, geronimo/specs/branches/1.0?
foolish consistency and hobgoblins not withstanding :) Bill
