+1 To add the JAXB specs to geronimo
I also like the plan.
-dain
On Dec 14, 2005, at 11:56 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Brett Porter wrote:
> Since JaxMe is at Apache, you can move it over with svn mv.
Exactly. However, initially, I'd prefer a copy operation. (No idea,
whether that's as easy in SVN.) That would give a smoother step. We
could wait until the generated jar files do meet the Maven
repositories and stuff like that.
> Has the JaxMe community as a whole voted to do this? I think it
makes
> sense, it would just be good to ensure everyone agrees. It will also
> impact the committer list for Geronimo.
You are absolutely right, Brett! Indeed, this should have been my
first step. It is just that I have found the directory
/www/cvs.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/
org.apache.geronimo.specs/
today and immediately had the thought that this would be a better
place. I'll start a vote on the jaxme-dev mailing list.
If this helps: I have no problem to request that we as the JaxMe
developers abandon work on the code base (except possibly
submitting patches). In other words, none of us would require to be
a committer.
Alan Cabrera wrote:
> Sounds great. Let's put it in our geronimo/specs/trunk. If it's
> stable, file a Jira w/ a tar of the files and I can plop that in.
The codebase is *very* stable. Indeed, it had almost no changes
since the import into the Apache repositories (almost 2 years ago).
No surprise: There almost only interfaces and almost no classes,
which are doing the actual work.
Jochen
