[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MMS-Smtp-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1 X-MMS-Smtp-Auth: Authenticated As [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MMS-Smtp-Mailer-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1
Yup...just sent out a note in a new thread. Dain Sundstrom wrote: > So are we ready to spin up another set of binaries now? > > -dain > > On Dec 17, 2005, at 5:04 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: > >> Its fixed...I set a defaultHost GBean reference in the engine. >> >> David Jencks wrote: >> >>> >>> On Dec 17, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Jeff Genender wrote: >>> >>>> The Engine is starting before the host. >>>> >>>> After chatting with Dain...the problem seems to be... >>>> >>>> The plan is looking for a collection of hosts. But this does not seem >>>> to place the dependency when there is a collection, only when its a >>>> single GBean reference. Therefore its random of who gets started >>>> first...call it luck of the draw? Therefore, this can rear its >>>> head in >>>> HEAD (no pun intended). >>>> >>>> The problem stems from the fact that the user can have "n" number of >>>> hosts...and the Engine needs to wait until all of these are started. >>>> >>>> I would have hoped that the Collection reference would act like a >>>> direct >>>> GBean reference and wait until all have started, but this was my >>>> misunderstanding. Can this be a problem for other GBeans that have >>>> collection dependencies down the road - not just for Tomcat? >>>> >>>> IMHO, I think the fact the Engine is starting before the Hosts is >>>> dangerous and very bad. >>>> >>>> I'll work on a solution of some form... >>> >>> >>> The only possibility I've thought of so far is a linked list starting >>> with the Engine with a reference to the first or last Host, and each >>> Host with a reference to another. I use something like this to order >>> the servlet startup in jetty. >>> >>> david jencks >>> >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote: >>>> >>>>> Does anybody know why the "unknown default host" warning still >>>>> occurs in >>>>> 1.0 but not in head? I thought Dain's fix was picked up by both >>>>> 1.0 and >>>>> head? I also thought the next 1.0 candidate build would be made from >>>>> the 1.0 branch and not head? Is this incorrect? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> -Dave- >>>>> >>>>> Jeff Genender wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I was too darn quick with my send button... >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes...let me follow up... >>>>>> >>>>>> Building form HEAD...this error (1377) does not occur...I should >>>>>> have >>>>>> made that more clear in all of my previous emails. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I've extracted and built a fresh copy of the 1.0 branch.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I no longer see the TradeEJB exception reported in >>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372!!!!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> However, I still see the "unknown default host" reported in >>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377. So, doesn't look like the 1372 fix addresses the >>>>>>> 1377 >>>>>>> problem. Jeff had suggested building head. Is there some other >>>>>>> fix in >>>>>>> head that isn't in the 1.0 branch that addresses this? Last time I >>>>>>> built head (last night).. I didn't see the "unknown default host" >>>>>>> error. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also, concerning the conversation as to whether 1377 is a >>>>>>> showstopper.. >>>>>>> Of course I'm sure that Jeff's assessment that there is no >>>>>>> functional >>>>>>> problem is totally accurate. However, I suspect the presence of >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> message in the log at initial startup will cause confusion and many >>>>>>> questions among new v1 users. It may give the wrong initial >>>>>>> perception >>>>>>> that the default geronimo v1 configuration doesn't work properly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hopefully Jeff will tell me that this is fixed in "head" and will >>>>>>> somehow be moved to v1.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On an unrelated note, I did see an exception during shutdown .. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.rafb.net/paste/results/H4vwRo78.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is this covered under any other JIRA? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> BTW, How long do the www.rafb.net paste entries last? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>> -Dave- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Here is the lost of outstanding defects and their status: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In Process >>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1364 - update welcome pages to point at HTTP redirects in >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> geronimo.apache.org site >>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1371 - Geronimo startup/shutdown issues >>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1375 - Invalid login to console should not produce stack >>>>>>>> trace >>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1377 - Startup Warning on tomcat - unknown default host. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Completed >>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1363 - DayTrader still using old geronimo-spec files - >>>>>>>> applied by Matt >>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1372 - Exception during startup - TradeEJB - Fixed per >>>>>>>> Dain >>>>>>>> GERONIMO-1373 - DB info portlet not working correctly - Applied by >>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would like to get the reminaing 4 knocked out today and respin a >>>>>>>> build tonight if all these issues are addressed or we know they >>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>> not be. The major ones are behind us. It sounds like we're >>>>>>>> going to >>>>>>>> have to spin an Open EJB 2.1.0 or some such release per the fix >>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>> Dain. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any volunteers on the other issues? Please assign them to >>>>>>>> yourself or >>>>>>>> send a note in this thread with your intent so everyone knows what >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> others are doing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Great work folks. I think we're almost there. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have to run some Christmas shopping errands this morning >>>>>>>> (EST) and >>>>>>>> will get back on in the afternoon. If someone needs me for some >>>>>>>> reason please feel free to call my cell (919)656-0564. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > > > >
